Meeting Compliance: What Regulated Industries Need from Video Platforms
Video conferencing platforms handle sensitive information. When the meetings contain patient information, client financial data, or legal advice, the platform becomes a data processor subject to regulatory requirements — and most platforms were not designed with those requirements in mind.
Compliance requirements by industry
| INDUSTRY | KEY COMPLIANCE CONCERN |
|---|---|
| Healthcare | HIPAA: PHI in transcripts, audit trails, access controls |
| Financial services | Record retention, suitability documentation |
| Legal | Privilege protection, client confidentiality controls |
| Government | Data sovereignty, security classification |
What to evaluate in a meeting platform
- Where is meeting data stored, and what is the data residency?
- What are the retention settings, and can they be configured per organization?
- Are AI features first-party or third-party data processors?
- Is there an audit log of who accessed which meeting records?
First-party vs third-party AI
A critical compliance distinction: AI features that are native to the meeting platform (like Oya in MeetOye) operate under the platform's data processing terms. AI features that are third-party add-ons add a separate data processor to the chain — with separate terms, separate audit requirements, and separate incident response obligations. For regulated industries, native AI is materially simpler to manage from a compliance perspective.